TOPIC: Philosopher's return to the origins of things
What do you think?
Note: setpoint that do ask that you review everything that is thinkable in a proposal, such as its theoretical meanings subjective and objective as possible, its presuppositions and foundations or theoretical material, its origins or context of its production, its impacts or consequences or intellectual practices in science or politics, or morality, etc.. Everyone thinks in terms of its sensitivity and each sensitivity is the intellectual or physical sensitivity determined by a collective history and personnelle.L key is to be logically and semantically edible even if what we say does not satisfy any hunger or thirst material.
INTRODUCTION
Moved by Mr. Gnana Samba Guejopaal
philosophy is presented to us by Pythagoras as an activity that expresses a human life in a deep and sincere love for wisdom and truth and as a path, a method, so as to march towards the truth and wisdom which is theoretical as it is an expression of theoretical knowledge and rational living a certain way to behave in the world meet its various natural and social events. In this movement toward wisdom, if the body and senses are not removed, it is mainly the reason or the mind or the ability to distinguish between pure right and wrong which is essentially the engine, an engine with several schemes sometimes contradictory. But in one direction as in another, in one way or its opposite, for the first philosophers philosophers called traditional or metaphysical idealists generally, what is sought by the philosopher is an original state of the world's existence or thing, a state of purity in which the only thing that itself needs no relationship with something else and lives in isolation and independence. These philosophers who speculate on the world with the sole power to declare the reason indeed not to seek know things as they are beyond these material things what each of them is present here and now in their multiplicity and diversity as individuals isolated from each other, but what, that an individual is incomplete, imperfect a thing in general, in itself, in itself, something perfect, eternal, unique, that called essence or nature, which would contain all the features of individual cases and represent the historical and 'imitate in the real world and lives are the same primitive essence. It is without doubt this conception of philosophy that we want to express in terms of our subject: "philosophy is to return to origins."
Yet science is also an expression of love in humans to know the truth of the world. But contrary to the philosophy that we often said to be his mother or his grandmother, she does not begin to say with reason, that are or what that was or what should be a difference in a rational world abstract in reason or in the spirit of their architect. It begins with the facts as they emerge from things externally and objectively observable and experienced by a process of piecemeal analysis of individual cases and then extract a common denominator which would be a fairly common essence or nature or a relative of common would a multitude of isolated cases of diverse expression of the same reality as concrete and historical appearances are conditioned by several factors cyclical. Why the difference between the approach and the philosophy of science in general or what justifies the choice of the philosopher in the field's collective knowledge shared with other agents search for the truth? We hope to make a rational and legitimate response to this question.
"the property is based on our horizon" 
0 comments:
Post a Comment