TOPIC: What do you think of this statement of Edith Stein: , "The philosophy is the truth the widest possible and most certain."?
INTRODUCTION
Moved by Mr. Gnana Samba
A theory or "truth" can be said "broader" than another when it contains the latter. Thus, for "larger truth" we can understand the truth that contains the greatest number of smaller truths she and why it is a general truth or incorporating their content. The size or extent the truth or a truth may also include or be determined by the number of natural or cultural phenomena that may explain this truth objectively or subjectively to understand. In this sense we can argue that philosophy seeks to achieve "the greatest truth, that is to say the truth which would help to understand the oneness in the diversity of human cultures, individual differences in within families of things and objects or living things that it studies, such as "the greatest truth," or gasoline or the nature of the man who performs imperfectly, partially, and differently in men that are specific historical peoples and individuals within these isolated peoples. Because, for philosophy, the nature of the thing, or the "thing itself" also called "thing itself" is what contains the intelligible world of ideas, all the historical aspects possible and never fully achieved this nature. In other words again, philosophy seeks a cause or a finite number of causes to explain a historical fact whose appearances are endless. To achieve this "truth the wider 'lives forever beyond mortal things that are imperfect in the sensible world, a place that sense can not reach, the philosophy is mobilizing its research officer preferred, namely the Because she believes to be done to return to the ultimate truth if it relies on its natural principles that shape his logic. Thus, it produces a formal truth evident particularly in the formal logic of Aristotle, in which the truth comes out of a set of logical relationships between the necessary concepts and proposals. This choice of the form of truth which also provides the theoretical foundation for philosophical truth is quite firm and it is this form of truth which allows to say that truth is a philosophical truth "definite" in its genesis or its production. But is it enough to speak without contradiction in the speech to ensure that the contradiction between thought and practice? If the report of the speech with itself is trustworthy, can we deduce the relationship between rhetoric and what he deals in history? Other hand, if science has inherited the cult of transparency and rigorous training in concepts and demonstration, and that besides the formal truth it produces, it comes into conflict with the facts to see if his thoughts captures and neutralizes or not, may we not say that science is the most certain knowledge among those who pursue the general laws that govern the observable by the senses and others that are beyond the power and vigilance of the senses? Religion and faith can not they also claim to be paths that lead through the revelation to the highest truths and safer than man can hope to achieve during his stay on earth?
It will be for us to show in what cases the definition of Edith Stein is right and what condition we are entitled to relativize the truth of this proposal.
"the property is based on our horizon" 
0 comments:
Post a Comment