Selon le falsificationisme, on peut montrer que certaines théories son fausses en faisant appel aux résultats d’observation et d’expérience. Un argument logique simple semble lui donner raison. J’ai déjà signalé au chapitre 2 que les déductions logiques fondées uniquement sur des énoncés d’observation true, assuming that we had, we can not in any way lead to universal laws and theories.
However, deductions are logical statements as premises singular observation can lead us to conclude that the falsity of universal laws and theories. For example: "there was a crow is not black, instead of x at time t is a statement that it follows the logical fallacy of" all crows are black. "That is the argument: Premise "There was a crow is not black, instead of x at time t. Conclusion: "All crows are not black" is a logically valid deduction. If the premise is true and the false conclusion is a contradiction.
Alan Francis Chalmers
"the property is based on our horizon" 
0 comments:
Post a Comment